Swaraj Party and No Changers

Swaraj Party and No Changers:
- C R Das, Motilal Nehru and Ajmal Khan wanted an end to the boycott of legislative councils so that the nationalists could enter them and fight from within the system.
- The Swaraj Party, Swarajaya Party or Swarajya Party, established as the Congress-Khilafat Swarajaya Party. It was inspired by the concept of Swaraj
- It was a political party formed in India in January 1923 after the Gaya Annual conference in December 1922 of the National Congress.
- It sought greater self-government and political freedom for the Indian people from the British Raj.
- Advocated entry into legislative councils came to be known as the Swarajists or Pro-changers, while the other school of thought led by Vallabhbhai Patel, Rajendra Prasad, C. Rajagopalachari & M.A. Ansari came to be known as the ‘No-changers’.
- C R Das and Motilal Nehru resigned from the presidency and secretaryship respectively of the Congress
- C R Das and Motilal Nehru announced the formation of Congress-Khilafat Swarajya Party, with C R Das as the president and Motilal Nehru as one of the secretary.
- Both sides wanted to avoid a 1907 type split and realised the significance of putting up a united front to get a mass movement to force the Government to introduce reforms
- Both sides also accepted the necessity of Gandhi’s leadership of a united nationalist front.
- Keeping these factors in mind, a compromise was reached at a meeting in Delhi in September 1923.
- The Swarajists were allowed to contest elections as a group within the Congress.
- The Swarajists accepted the Congress programme with only one difference—that they would join legislative councils.
- The elections to the newly constituted Central Legislative Assembly and to provincial assemblies were to be held in November 1923.
- The Swarajist Manifesto for Elections Released in October 1923, the manifesto took a strong anti-imperialist line. It said—
-
-
-
- the guiding motive of the British in governing India is to secure selfish interests of their own country
- the so-called reforms are only a blind to further the said interests under the pretence of granting a responsible government
- the real objective being to continue exploitation of the unlimited resources of the country by keeping Indians permanently in a subservient position to Britain
- the Swarajists would present the nationalist demand of self-government in councils
- if this demand was rejected, they would adopt a policy of uniform, continuous and consistent obstruction within the councils to make governance through councils impossible;
- councils would thus be wrecked from within by creating deadlocks on every measure.
-
-
- In the November 1923 elections, the Swarajists had managed to win 42 out of 141 elected seats and a clear majority in the provincial assembly of Central Provinces.
Objectives of the Swaraj Party
- Attaining dominion status.
- Obtaining the right to frame a constitution.
- Establishing control over the bureaucracy.
- Obtaining full provincial autonomy.
- Attaining Swarajya (self-rule).
- Getting people the right to control government machinery.
- Organising industrial and agricultural labour.
- Controlling the local and municipal bodies.
- Having an agency for propaganda outside the country.
- Establishing a federation of Asian countries to promo
Major Achievements of Swarajists or Pro-changers
-
-
- With coalition partners, they outvoted the Government several times, even on matters relating to budgetary grants, and passed adjournment motions.
- A noteworthy achievement was the defeat of the Public Safety Bill in 1928 which was aimed at empowering the Government to deport undesirable and subversive foreigners
- As the Government was alarmed by the spread of socialist and communist ideas and believed that a crucial role was being played by the British and other foreign activists being sent by the Commintern.
- But by 1924, the Swarajist position had weakened because of widespread communal riots, split among Swarajists themselves on communal and Responsivist, Non-responsivist lines; the death of C.R. Das in 1925 weakened it further.
-
No Changers
- Led by Vallabhbhai Patel, Rajendra Prasad, C. Rajagopalachari & M.A. Ansari
- The ‘No-changers’ opposed council entry.
- They advocated concentration on constructive work, and continuation of boycott and noncooperation
- They also advocated quiet preparation for resumption of the suspended civil disobedience programme
Constructive Work by No-Changers
- Ashrams sprang up where young, men and women worked, among tribals and lower castes (especially in Kheda and Bardoli areas of Gujarat), and popularised charkha and khadi.
- National schools and colleges were set up where students were trained in a non-colonial ideological framework.
- Significant work was done for Hindu-Muslim unity, removing untouchability, boycott of foreign cloth and liquor, and for flood relief.
- The constructive workers served as the backbone of civil disobedience as active organisers.
Drawbacks
- They could not coordinate their struggle inside the Assembly with the mass freedom struggle outside.
- They totally relied on newspapers to carry their work and message in the Assembly to the outside world.
- Some of them could not resist the perks of power. Motilal Nehru was a member of the Skeen Committee and A Ramaswamy Iyengar was a member of the Public Accounts Committee.
- Their policy of obstructionism had its flaws and limitations.
- The death of C R Das in 1925 further weakened the party.
- There were internal divisions among the Swarajists. They were divided into the responsivists and the non-responsivists. The responsivists (M M Malaviya, Lala Lajpat Rai, N C Kelkar) wanted to cooperate with the government and hold offices, whereas the non-responsivists (Motilal Nehru) withdrew from legislatures in 1926.
- The party was in shambles when it went into the 1926 elections, and as a result, did not fare well.
- The party’s failure to support the peasant cause in Bengal led to a loss of support of many members.
- The party merged with the Congress in 1930.